RECALL AND REPETITION IN A MODIFIED RIGHT-WRONG PARADIGM = RAPPEL ET REPETITION DANS UN PARADIGME MODIFIE VRAI-FAUXHUMPHREYS MS.1972; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 573-582; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

FREQUENCY AND RECENCY IN CUED RECALL: INTERACTION OF OLD AND NEW LEARNING.HUMPHREYS MS.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 413-422; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE DERIVATION OF ENDPOINT AND DISTANCE EFFECTS IN LINEAR ORDERINGS FROM FREQUENCY INFORMATION.HUMPHREYS MS.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 5; PP. 496-505; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ERRORS AS A FUNCTION OF NOUN COUNCRETENESS = LES ERREURS EN FONCTION DU CARACTERE CONCRET DES NOMSHUMPHREYS MS; YUILLE JC.1973; CANAD. J. PSYCHOL.; CANADA; DA. 1973; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 83-94; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 9REF.Article

EXAMINATIONS OF THE CATEGORY-RECALL FUNCTION = EXAMEN DE LA FONCTION RAPPEL-CATEGORIESSCHWARTZ RM; HUMPHREYS MS.1972; AMER. J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 85; NO 2; PP. 189-200; BIBL. 8REF.Article

CUED RECALL AND CUE RECOGNITION: HOW SIMILAR ARE THE PROCESSES.HUMPHREYS MS; BOWYER PA.1981; AM. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 94; NO 1; PP. 65-84; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EFFECT OF A RECOGNITION TEST ON SUBSEQUENT CUED-RECALL TESTBOWYER PA; HUMPHREYS MS.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 348-359; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

DIFFERENCES IN LONG-TERM RETENTION IN RELATION TO EARLY SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENTHALL JW; HUMPHREYS MS; WILSON KP et al.1983; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (THE); ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 96; NO 2; PP. 267-287; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

FREQUENCY JUDGMENT ACCURACY AS A FUNCTION OF AGE AND SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT (LEARNING DISABLED VERSUS NON-LEARNING-DISABLED) PATTERNSLUND AM; HALL JW; WILSON KP et al.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-0965; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 35; NO 2; PP. 236-247; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

AROUSAL AND RECOGNITION MEMORY: THE EFFECTS OF IMPULSIVITY, CAFFEINE AND TIME ON TASKBOWYER PA; HUMPHREYS MS; REVELLE W et al.1983; PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 41-49; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

CHILDREN'S CUED RECALL: DEVELOPMENTAL DIFFERENCES IN RETRIEVAL OPERATIONSHALL JW; MURPHY J; HUMPHREYS MS et al.1979; J. EXPER. CHILD. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 501-511; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE INTERACTIVE EFFECT OF PERSONALITY, TIME OF DAY, AND CAFFEINE: A TEST OF THE AROUSAL MODELREVELLE W; HUMPHREYS MS; SIMON L et al.1980; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 109; NO 1; PP. 1-31; BIBL. 3 P.Article

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN DIURNIAL RHYTHMS AND MULTIPLE ACTIVATION STATES: A REPLY TO M. W. EYSENCK AND FOLKARDHUMPHREYS MS; REVELLE W; SIMON L et al.1980; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 109; NO 1; PP. 42-48; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

IMPULSIVITY, NEUROTICISM, AND CAFFEINE: DO THEY HAVE ADDITIVE EFFECTS ON AROURAL.CRAIG MJ; HUMPHREYS MS; ROCKLIN T et al.1979; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; NO 4; PP. 404-419; BIBL. 26 REF.Article